Google’s Next Move: Semantic Search?

Google is full of really smart people working on really hard problems. This is nothing new. Indeed the image of brilliant young engineers working on game-changing new products has come to define the company’s identity. What’s surprising to me is Google’s relative lack of significant innovation in recent years on its bread-and-butter product: search. Recent rumblings indicate that this may start to change.

The company is understandably hesitant to tinker with its core product, which some analysts estimate generates over 90% of its total revenue, especially given its most recent quarter which exceeded even the most optimistic expectations (in a recession, no less). But the sands are shifitng, and the sheer size of Google means it will be hard-pressed to compete with smaller, more nimble competitors who are starting to get attention, like Powerset and Twitter.

A recent article at Google Watch suggests that Google sees its future in the semantic web, a collection of standards and technologies that seek to deliver more meaning and structure to the web’s content but have largely languished due to a lack of widespread adoption. From the article, Google CEO Eric Schmidt is recently quoted as saying:

“Wouldn’t it be nice if Google understood the meaning of your phrase rather than just the words that are in [...]

continue >>

How Will Facebook Connect Impact the Social Web?

Razorfish - Portable Social GraphsRazorfish recently released a presentation entitled “Portable Social Graphs - Imagining Their Potential.” You can download it here on Slideshare. It’s an insightful and thought-provoking look at what the next few years might hold as social web applications take their first steps toward meaningful integration - sharing profile data, relationships, and even authentication across the traditional “walled garden” model of separate and distinct platforms.

This concept isn’t entirely new. Standards like like “friend-of-a-friend” (with awkward moniker “FOAF“) have attempted to provide the mechanisms necessary to share structured social data in an intelligent and contextual way. But historically, proprietary social networks have failed to embrace open standards and have declined to enable their users - and competitors - to use their members’ data, arguably their most valuable asset.

And perhaps the most useful aspect of FB Connect is that it simply saves the user time. Blog platforms and comment systems like Disqus have already plugged in to FB Connect so that you can comment on a myriad of blogs without having to register an account for each one. That yields a real, tangible time savings for a huge audience and lets users carry their identity with them from site to site with minimal effort. The time saved is the [...]

continue >>

VC Calm in an Economic Storm?

Sequoia Capital
ATV Ventures
Bay Partners
Palomar Ventures
Voyager Capital
Hummer Winblad

For anyone who caught the Powerpoint slide deck from what has come to be known as Sequoia Capital’s “Holy Sh*t” Meeting, this is shaping up to be a challenging environment for even the most innovative startups to raise capital or indeed, survive at all.

But if you heard the who’s-who of Silicon Valley venture fund partners that were gathered for a panel at the recent Web 3.0 Conference, or even a recent NYSIA panel discussion featuring Fred Wilson from Union Square Ventures, you’d come away with more of a sense of cautious optimism rather than the “OMG it’s the freaking apocalypse” ethos that many seem to have adopted as the the startup worldview du jour.

So for the benefit of those who might have an interest in what some of Silicon Valley’s VC wonks were saying, I’ve compiled the highlights from the discussion in this third installment from the Web 3.0 Conference. The panel was moderated by Rebekah Wu, CEO of Right Hand Partners. I’ve done my best to attribute comments where possible.

On what should make it into a presentation or pitch to [...]

continue >>

Web 3.0 Conference, Part II: Technology

Cloud computing is all the rage these days. Albert Wenger of Union Square Ventures gave an interesting talk at the Web 2.0 Expo in NYC recently which covered some of the implications of cloud computing. At the Web 3.0 Conference there was a lively discussion about some of the more technical issues surrounding cloud computing, software as a service, and web architectures in general. Here are some of the points that were made:

A general rule of building out any system that needs to scale is to look at every layer in your system as a caching opportunity to minimize processing.

Start with clusterable technologies wherever possible.

The cloud has made “spinning up” instances of your application just an API call away. It’s extremely flexible and basically means you’ll (almost) never have to think about hardware again.

Amazon AWS is the leading cloud solution right now and is extremely flexible because it provides access to the HTTP layer. It’s becoming the Wal-Mart of cloud solutions and it’s price-optimized for CPU cycles.

IBM could become a major player in cloud computing over the next 2-10 years because of their history of mainframe architecture. The cloud is [...]

continue >>

Web 3.0 Conference, Part I: Strategy

web 3.0 conferenceLast week I attended the Web 3.0 Conference in Santa Clara, CA. The atmosphere was a cross between an academic conference and a trade show, trending toward the latter. Sessions were mostly organized as panel discussions split into two tracks: technology and business.

I’ve compiled some comments and insights from the sessions I attended. I thought I’d share them here for anyone who’s interested. This is the first of three rounds of comments, split into Strategy, Technology, and VC/Startups. These are my best attempts at paraphrasing based on my notes and I’ve done my best to attribute these comments where possible.

Semantic technologies are about defining an architecture of participation (Tom Tague, Thomson Reuters)

Shared ontologies are a necessary condition for web 3.0 and therefore must be community-driven (Marc Hatfield, Alitora Systems)

Semantic tech is increasing the granularity of the web’s nodes, shifting from documents to things like objects, facts, places, and people. This increase of granularity is a defining characteristic of web 3.0. An effect of this trend is to increase the number of storable data points by several orders of magnitude. This presents an enormous information management problem. Therefore we need fundamentally new tools to process, organize, and consume this amount of data. (Tom [...]

continue >>

Two Web Standards That Will Change the World

Unless you follow the often arcane world of web standards and the organization that defines them, you probably haven’t heard much about two emerging standards that by some credible accounts will do more to change the landscape of the internet than anything since the web itself: RDF and SPARQL.

Part of what makes these technologies so compelling is their elegance: they are incredibly simple and yet have the potential to yield extremely powerful and useful results. (NB: while this entry focuses on RDF and SPARQL, these are only two pieces of a larger heirarchy of standards and frameworks designed to help realize the semantic web as a widespread and practical technology.)

RDF, or Resource Description Framework, is a collection of methods for structuring information and representing knowledge. The goal is to enable applications to automatically catalogue and exchange information based on common sets of meaningful terms, or ontologies. In its simplest form, RDF statements are triples of the form (a,b,c) representing subject-predicate-object statements. It’s a subtle but powerful tool that can enable the efficient sharing of facts — e.g., (”Kinshasa”,”isCapitalOf”,”Democratic Republic of Congo”) might be a representation of a fact about an African nation’s capital (note that the same triple can be used to derive information about both the subject and object). [...]

continue >>

In MS/Yahoo! Struggle, the Semantic Web May Benefit

In the ever-shifting landscape of internet titans, the Microsoft/Yahoo! power struggle is looking more like a teenage soap opera, albeit one with billions of dollars and control of the #2 internet search position in play. But what’s more, the side effects of the struggle are starting to point to a power play for dominance of the burgeoning world of the semantic web.

Besides the posturing and very public nature of both companies’ actions, what’s most interesting — and sometimes most telling — are the investments, partnerships, and acquisitions that have been unfolding since the saga began.

One of the more recent moves was Microsoft’s acquisition of the semantic search firm Powerset, itself coming on the heels of Yahoo!’s recent announcement of its open search platform, providing some support for semantic data to third party developers.

The Powerset acquisition is more than bet-hedging against losing out on its bid for Yahoo!. What Microsoft has started to understand is that the next killer app of the web will be found in the nascent semantic technologies and standards that are only starting to take shape.

Companies large and small are starting to invest big money in semantic web research and development. But if Microsoft can spend big money buying their way [...]

continue >>